Dear Sweet Mother Of God
2009 July 9
Ginsburg explains Roe v Wade
From TheBlogProf
NB: Deranged comments will be deleted at the author’s discretion
Ginsburg explains Roe v Wade
From TheBlogProf
NB: Deranged comments will be deleted at the author’s discretion
[1]
How long before Planned Parenthood gets an award for Reducing America’s carbon footprint?
[2]
gerryowen…probably already in the works!
in his special spot in Hell, Hitler is muttering to himself: “I was just ahead of my time!“
[3]
If a Republican-appointed judge had said this:
Congress would already be working on impeachment.
It beats me how someone who is Jewish can discuss “unwanted populations” in this manner.
[4]
The update that theblogprof has from Ace is quite good:
[5]
It beats me how someone who is Jewish can discuss “unwanted populations” in this manner.
Yes. I can’t explain how 16 tons of irony does not crush her like a, well, 16 ton weight after a remark like that.
Anyone still want to argue that Hitler wasn’t a leftist?
[6]
Ginsberg, however, seems to think that the whole purpose was not to advance the interests of the individual, but to advance the interest of the state in culling undesirables from the population. — from the ‘clarification’
Dear Mother of God, this is an ‘improvement’? That’s like the SS wanting to rebrand ZyklonB as a cleasning agent.
[7]
Maybe we can ask Sotomayor to explain what she Ginsburg really meant. After all, Ginsburg is white, isn’t she?
[8]
heh. No danger of “wise Jewess” remarks after this revelation….
[9]
Dear Mother of God, this is an ‘improvement’? That’s like the SS wanting to rebrand ZyklonB as a cleasning agent.
They don’t think like the founders, exactly, now do they, those lefties?
[10]
The decision itself casts it as a right to reproductive freedom of an individual. And in court cases, if a dispute can be cast as the individual versus the state, the individual will almost always win.
Well, they left one particular individual out of their consideration, who must die to preserve the mother’s “reproductive rights.” And they never did anything wrong, and cannot speak for themselves.
Life first, then liberty. The left has it backward as usual.
[11]
RWY, given time the Left would permit eugenics up to the age of 18 and after the age of 75. Why? Both groups typically don’t vote. The former because they can’t, the latter as they typically don’t. Can’t have good graft and corruption if there is not a vote to steal.
[12]
If it ever gets to that point, well, I doubt there’d be voting taking place….
[13]
The left is not particularly given to introspection, you could say, without going out on a limb too far….
[14]
Oh I don’t know…..They keep saying ‘Every vote counts, count every vote’. Tho they never seem to get around to counting the military vote. I wonder why that is?????
[15]
What are you talking about? They’re always in some kind of circle gazing at something.
[16]
in the downward direction, yes, I suppose…
[17]
Can anybody imagine the cries and wails forthcoming when Zero’s poll numbers really tank?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElJFYwRtrH4
(A forgotten favorite)
[18]
I know I posted on this earlier…but my blood is STILL boiling, so here’s more:
We have people in power now who are convinced that THEY and only THEY know what and WHO is best! Eugenics is an idea that sprang from the LEFT! They naturally believe that their “superior intellects” provide THEM (and only THEM) with the “wisdom” to determine who should:
- be born and who should not
- receive healthcare and who should not
- be allowed to speak and who should not
Our new Masters view the book ‘1984′ as a “How-To” book!
I think our Founders must have foreseen the rise of such monsters…for they included the 2nd Amendment in our Bill of RIGHTS!
[19]
They were the good guys in the book, don’t forget.
[20]
I know Cap & Trade is on hold,
BUT my biggest concern is giving government the right and ability to tax our respiration, to label what we exhale as “Pollution”.
I keep thinking back to the debates against the Income tax when Opposition fretted that taxes could raise to “as high as 5, even 10 percent”!
How long until the the Environmentalist movement comes to the conclusion that to reduce CO2, you must reduce the Human Population? Since we pollute, we must go- at least a lot of us. It is an entirely logical conclusion if you buy into their distorted reality.
Roe v Wade, Cap and trade, Euthanasia, etc. This movie will not end pretty.
[21]
gerryowen: “Roe v Wade, Cap and trade, Euthanasia, etc. This movie will not end pretty.”
I think it ends with Charleton Heston screaming: “Solyent Green is PEOPLE!!!!!!“
[22]
LOL Exactly!
[23]
What the flinging flug!?!? I kept thinking maybe it was satire because no one outside of stormfront says stuff like that. How can a person be so deluded?