OK, You Can Talk to Your Neighbors Again
|
hide details 10:30 PM (2 minutes ago)
|
|
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.2.1 <flag@whitehouse.gov>… The email address you just sent a message to is no longer in service.We are now accepting your feedback about health insurance reform via:http://www.whitehouse.gov/realitycheck (state 14).
———————————————————-
With that the snitch line appears to be no more.
I will grant its good, but lets not fool ourselves. There is an internal reason the White House stopped this. Something tactical that gave them pause from an exposure sense that they considered too inopportune to continue with.
[1]
I think the “Go Flag Yourself” campaign worked as intended. HA
[2]
Like all statists, they are morphing the snitching to a different name:
MM has this comment and an excerpt from Reality Check:
Rather than shut down the entire fiasco, they are expanding it:
[3]
Legal Insurrection has this:
[4]
If the gloves doesn’t fit…
[5]
Damn –
I was planning to sell a frequency program to the Federal Government through which citizens could earn points for ratting on their friends and associates (with bonuses if these friends/associates were sent to reeducation camps). Points could be redeemed for Barack Obama merchandise or NAZI and Soviet memoribilia.
[6]
LOL!
[7]
BC,
That does bum me out. I had my eye on a Russian Officers coat. Was going to use my OFA loyalty card. only two punches left and the coat would have been mine. Bummer….
[8]
Scientists in Israel have demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate DNA evidence, undermining the credibility of what has been considered the gold standard of proof in criminal cases. — refer by KH
The problem with DNA evidence is that it is exclusionary evidence. The absence of DNA is the only proof that someone raped, or was not at a crime scene. Problem is way too many crime scenes would be tainted with the perp and others. Murder for example is overwhelming committed by persons who know each other. Which means DNA is already existing prior to event at the event itself. Which of course DNA does not come with a time stamp.
[9]
Exactly Dr. which is why I’ve never been a fan of dna “banks”, or is use beyond as you say as “exclusionary evidence”.