Happy Anniversary!!

2012 March 18
by justrand

This weekend the “Occupy _____” [insert thing to be occupied] “movement” (OK, it’s an invented thing) celebrated its 6 month anniversary!!!  WooHoo!!!

And they did it up right, according to the news outlets:

[in NY, per Reuters] Dozens arrested at Occupy’s 6-month anniversary rally – “The sweep of the park by police just before midnight capped a day of demonstrations and marching in lower Manhattan. There was no official word on the number of arrests but dozens of people were handcuffed and led out of the park. Earlier in the day, 15 people were arrested and three officers suffered injuries, police said.

And Michael “MegaBucks” Moore was there to declare: “This park is sacred ground for millions across the country“.   Well, to rats, rapists, muggers, anti-Semites and freeloaders I guess it IS “sacred”!

In our ‘Alice in Wonderland’ world, an AstroTurfed “movement” (‘Occupy’) that leads to hundreds of rapes, multiple murders, hundreds of injuries to police, thousands of arrests, countless thefts, millions of dollars in damages, and open anti-Semitism is PRAISED and LAUDED by the media!  Meanwhile, a peaceful authentic GrassRoots movement (TEA Party), that is vastly larger yet has ZERO incidents of crime perpetrated by its members, cost ZERO taxpayer money, and injured ZERO police is villified as “Hateful”.

Happy Anniversary indeed.


38 Responses leave one →
  1. 2012 March 18 6:38 am
    justrand permalink

    p.s. in fairness to the Occupiers (duh!) I should note that the picture in the post is from the peaceful Oakland event a couple months ago. Last night’s event didn’t involve fire, as apparently the greedy “1%’ers” are now hoarding that!!

    now back to your regurlarly scheduled media fawning over the “peaceful” Occupiers!

  2. 2012 March 18 7:02 am
    justrand permalink

    O/T…or maybe not considering the rampant anti-Semitism and anti-Christian nature of the Occupiers:


    “This is not a small-time radical imam trying to stir up his followers with fiery hate speech. This was a considered, deliberate and specific ruling from one of the most important leaders in the Muslim world. It does not just create a religious obligation for those over whom the mufti has direct authority; it is also a signal to others in the Muslim world that destroying churches is not only permitted but mandatory.”

    read the whole thing…

  3. 2012 March 18 7:20 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Who will be our Pelagius of Asturias to retake from the Islamists what is ours??

  4. 2012 March 18 7:32 am
    justrand permalink

    I dunno, drdog…but the Spaniards needed El Cid a couple hundred years later to RE-take it! *sigh*

    btw…I had to look up his history to re-educate myself on hum ( 🙂 )…and it is fascinating (though expected that WikiPedia has THIS: “but there is no strong evidence that he was motivated by any religious desire.

    REALLY? Nah…the evidence is very strong, it’s just inconvenient these days, so WikiPedia throws that line in. OWN HARDCOPY ENCYLCOPEDIAS, folks…they can’t be altered to appease Big Brother.

  5. 2012 March 18 7:36 am
    drdog09 permalink

    By the bye, the picture has an interesting symbolism. The signpost, what does it say and which way does it point?

  6. 2012 March 18 7:39 am
    justrand permalink

    and Drudge FINALLY caught up with what JM posted yesterday:

    Folks, questions abound as to (a) why NOW? and (b) why an ExecOrder versus legislation?

    EOs are not “law”…and can be (and are) thrown out by subsequent Presidents. So if there really IS a threat that requires we be prepared longterm…why an EO? And why now?

    Anyway, it’s good to see that Drudge finally woke up! 🙂

  7. 2012 March 18 7:40 am
    justrand permalink

    I love that, drdog! 🙂

  8. 2012 March 18 8:00 am
    drdog09 permalink


    Watch toward the very end and listen carefully. Biden is being booed as well as cheered.

  9. 2012 March 18 8:03 am
    justrand permalink

    drdog, that probably just reminded Joe of that time that Abraham Lincoln’s Facebook account got hacked…

  10. 2012 March 18 8:17 am

    9. Or that 1929 FDR presidential address to the nation about the stock market crash via TV! 😉 You know before he was even president and before there was anyone but a few engineers with receivers.

  11. 2012 March 18 8:18 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Presumably by President Hayes, sneaky bastard.

  12. 2012 March 18 8:30 am
    justrand permalink

    a commenter (RationalThought) on HotAir had this analysis on the EO:

    The previous document (Ed) you linked to said

    Sec. 202. Determinations. The authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:”

    It now says:

    “Sec. 202. Determinations. Except as provided in section 201(e) of this order, the authority delegated by section 201 of this order may be used only to support programs that have been determined in writing as necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense:

    And section 201, e, previously said:

    “(e) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs is hereby delegated the authority under subsection 101(c)(3) of the Act, and will be assisted by the Director, FEMA, in ensuring the coordinated administration of the Act.

    It now says:

    “(e) The Secretary of each resource department, when necessary, shall make the finding required under section 101(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(b). This finding shall be submitted for the President’s approval through the Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor and the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Upon such approval, the Secretary of the resource department that made the finding may use the authority of section 101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a), to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.

  13. 2012 March 18 8:38 am
    drdog09 permalink

    But see yet again, the EA is only stating what is already in a bill passed by Congress — “101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a),”. So should we praise Obama for being forthright in his intent or for Clinton and Bush for being sneaky about theirs??

    I can’t believe I am defending this man….

  14. 2012 March 18 8:55 am
    JustMary permalink

    Legal Insurrection has this to say:

    I’m not ruling out the possibility that this is more than it seems, but unless and until someone does more than merely state that martial law is coming, I’ll consider this to be routine.

    Folks are wondering why this is being done before the election…and I think that if he truly believes he will lose, he could declare martial law and suspend elections. The left projected heavily that teh eeeeeevil Booooosh might do something similar, and when they project, it is because they know they would do it. OR if he loses after the election really does take place…he seeks revenge. Occutwerps won’t mind servitude, and they certainly don’t care if what other people have is confiscated.

  15. 2012 March 18 9:04 am

    I’m putting my fingers in my ears today while I just rock out to the 80’s .

    Popping them like candy.

  16. 2012 March 18 9:07 am
    JustMary permalink

    #16 I’m going to see Def Leppard, Poison, and Lita Ford in June. 😀

    I suppose I should beware of what drugs might be getting passed around there…but then again…given the ages of the rockers, I am sure it will be Viagra being passed around, not rec drugs (#waragainstwomen!).

  17. 2012 March 18 9:22 am
    mulletover permalink

  18. 2012 March 18 9:33 am
    mulletover permalink

    The differences between earlier versions of this EO and this one are minimal, and one should not overreact.

    On the other hand, the differences between earlier presidents and this oNE are great, and therein lies the problem. obama has shown time and time again he is willing to trash the Bill of Rights, and his intent screams to all of us …… “Be vigilant lest you lose your freedoms!”

  19. 2012 March 18 9:44 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Last observation on the EO. If We the People fear it, there is a way to solve it — Get Congress to repeal or significantly modify the NDA.

  20. 2012 March 18 9:45 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Def Leppard is still performing?? Guess I should know better with Mick still prancing around a stage….

  21. 2012 March 18 9:54 am
    JustMary permalink

    #21 I just want to see if they wear some leather pants!!!! Hubs and I saw Motley Crue/Scorpions about 12 years ago, and they were rocking leg warmers and spandex like nobody’s business.

  22. 2012 March 18 10:50 am
    drdog09 permalink


    Rockin’ Rockers —

  23. 2012 March 18 10:50 am
    gnqanq permalink

    Mullet – I totally agree with you.

    I think it is much a do about nothing. Past Presidents (both Rs and Ds) have had similar EO’s.

    Obama does scare me more than any past Presidents including Nixon on what he might do. But IF he does pull a National Emergency declaring Martial Law – he may have just lit the fuse to a civil war to match any in history.

    Carthage wont have any thing on this one.

  24. 2012 March 18 10:53 am
    drdog09 permalink


    The thing that always is swimming in my head is what will the trigger be to invoke martial law?

  25. 2012 March 18 10:58 am
    TLS permalink

    #25 OWS?

  26. 2012 March 18 11:00 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Honesty, its what’s for dinner —

  27. 2012 March 18 11:04 am
    drdog09 permalink

    TLS, they very well could be.

  28. 2012 March 18 11:06 am
    JustMary permalink

    #25 and #26 Obama losing the election?

  29. 2012 March 18 11:08 am
    gnqanq permalink

    drdog – I can think of a few things. But it has to be really big.

    We went through the civil unrest of the 1960’s without a NATIONAL Martial Law being declared.

    We had the Cuban Missile Crisis without one.

    We even had a Civil War without one.

    If you had civil unrest in major cities due to the Occupy crowd, it still would not warrant it. Plus the vast majority of the country (rural & burbs) would be without problems and suspect of any national declarations.

    In my mind I and down to either a pandemic, total economic collapse (which nobody will listen to DC at that time) or the loss of a city or cities due to a nuke (terrorism).

    Those 3 things are all I can imagine would call for Martial Law. Like I said, it has to be off the charts OR the people will be suspect. Even then you are going to have people thinking conspiracy theory.

    Any thing less could lite the fuse.

  30. 2012 March 18 11:29 am
    JustMary permalink

    #30 All those things that happened before didn’t happen with Obama in charge. He will not let a crisis go to waste.

  31. 2012 March 18 11:32 am
    mulletover permalink

    I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace.

    ~~Thomas Paine

  32. 2012 March 18 11:50 am

    C’mon baby do the loco-motion….
    It even makes you happy
    When you’re feeling blue 🙂

  33. 2012 March 18 11:51 am
    gnqanq permalink

    JM – yeah, he could TRY to do it. BUT he and his followers better be ready for the blow back.

    It would be a game of high stakes poker.

    Are his people willing to bet their LIFE on it?

  34. 2012 March 18 11:55 am
    JustMary permalink

    #34 There is a demotivational poster about meetings that says “none of us are as dumb as all of us”. I think they would try, yes. They are delusional enough to think they will win, after all…they are made up of the 18-25 year old crowd that still knows “everything”. Sadly, they don’t realize that age and preparedness trumps youthful stupidity. Look at the occupy crowd…they are feeling pretty invincible right now. Mob rule. Frankly, look at satan…he knows what the Bible says, and yet, things will play out because he still thinks he can win. He is going to lose, horribly, but he will still try! Same thing here.

  35. 2012 March 18 12:33 pm
    gnqanq permalink

    JM – I will lay it out plain and simple.

    IF it comes, I will not hesitate to eliminate any and all regardless of age from the other side. I don’t take prisoners in said type situations.

    And I am not alone in my thinking. I know many on our side who are like minded.

    As I said, I don’t want IT, BUT if they bring it, they better be prepared for Armageddon. Because I will becoming and I will be bringing HELL with me.

  36. 2012 March 18 1:00 pm

    And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him~~~REV 6:8

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.