“Pro-Choice” Demands “No Choice” for Opponents

2018 March 29
by bc3b

Abortion proponents are “pro choice” when the decision positively affects their side. But, when it comes to anyone who opposes abortion, they demand “no choice.” We see this in so many ways: the push for restrictive laws for those who protest abortion, by the State of Kalifornia trying to force Crisis Pregnancy Centers to promote abortion, etc.

Now the abortion industry wants to force doctors, nurses and other medical staff personnel to participate in abortions against their will, even if they are morally opposed to abortion.

Peel the outer layer off most liberals and you’ll discover an authoritarian fascist who views the government as a weapon to strip opponents of their rights,

Abortion proponents on Monday made clear their displeasure with the Trump administration’s proposed conscience protections for healthcare providers, saying in effect that doctors and nurses who have religious objections to abortion should be forced to participate in the practice nonetheless.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed rule, which largely reinstates a George W. Bush-era policy that had been scuttled by the Obama administration, is founded on a number of federal laws guaranteeing that individuals and associations participating in healthcare programs receiving federal funding — a category that today encompasses the vast majority of care in the United States — will not be forced to participate in practices to which they have moral objections. The deadline for public comment on the rule was Tuesday.

HHS quotes a 1965 Supreme Court decision explaining the need for such protections: “Both morals and sound policy require that the State should not violate the conscience of the individual. All our history gives confirmation to the view that liberty of conscience has a moral and social value which makes it worthy of preservation at the hands of the state.”

The abortion industry, however, will have none of this. As far as it is concerned, letting anyone opt out of performing abortions is tantamount to denying women the option of killing their unborn children.

Thus, Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, organized a comment-writing campaign, explaining on Facebook: “The Trump-Pence administration is trying to make it easier for a wide range of institutions and entities, including hospitals, pharmacies, doctors, nurses, even receptionists, to deny patients the critical care they need through a new proposed rule.”

“But ‘critical care’ it is not,” observed LifeNews.com. “What the abortion group really wants is to force doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other medical professionals to abort unborn babies.”

Planned Parenthood further argued that the rule “could lead to widespread discrimination in virtually every part of the health care system,” a message echoed by the pro-abortion National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), which claimed in a tweet, “This rule would allow religion or morality to interfere in the patient-provider relationship. The bottom line is that this rule puts patients dead last.”

Read more: thenewamerican.com/…/28610-pro-choice-groups-doctors-should-have-no-choice-but-to-perform-abortions

18 Responses leave one →
  1. 2018 March 29 6:29 pm
    [1]
    bc3b permalink

    Some good news, especially for Kalifornians:

    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-reinhardt-obit-20180329-story.html

    Reinhardt’s wife was head of the Southern Kalifornia ACLU.

    No point in being nice and civil. No point in being dishonest.

  2. 2018 March 29 8:01 pm
    [2]
    justrand permalink

    Bc3b, Trump Needs to immediately nominate THE most Conservative he can find to fill that 9th Circuit spot.

    Force the issue.

  3. 2018 March 29 8:20 pm
    [3]
    Eph permalink

    BC,

    Don’t get too excited.
    Like the omnibus, the GOP will fold like a lawn chair.

  4. 2018 March 30 5:21 am
    [4]
    bc3b permalink

    Hillary :”No one ever told a man who lost an election to shut up.”

    http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/380922-hillary-clinton-fires-back-at-critics-no-one-told-a-man-who

    I cannot recall any man, even Al Gore, running such an incompetent campaign and spending the next two years blaming everyone else.

  5. 2018 March 30 6:03 am
    [5]
    drdog09 permalink

    “I cannot recall any man, even Al Gore, running such an incompetent campaign and spending the next two years blaming everyone else.”

    Yeah but Al was a better grifter. He had the carbon exchange thing ramping up soon after. I suspect that Clinton’s ‘explaining’ is a campaign to prevent megadonors from asking for their money back. I doubt if it is really aimed for our consumption.

  6. 2018 March 30 6:35 am
    [6]
    justrand permalink

    Poor poor Hillary. Right up until she lost the election to Trump, the Clinton “Foundation” was blackmailing convincing “donors” to support the Clinton empire worthy causes worldwide.

    Now the Clinton Foundation can’t put on a freaking bake-sale. Gee…I guess the “worthy causes” we’re just a FRONT all along! Who knew?

  7. 2018 March 30 9:35 am
    [7]
    JustMary permalink

    She wasn’t supposed to lose.

  8. 2018 March 30 9:45 am
    [8]
    justrand permalink

    JM, yup…in fact she was guaranteed to WIN.

  9. 2018 March 30 9:57 am
    [9]

    “The UK government’s presentation on the Salisbury incident, which was repeatedly cited in recent days as an “ultimate proof” of Russia’s involvement into Skripal’s assassination attempt, was made public earlier today.

    This 6-paged PDF is a powerful evidence of another intellectual low of British propaganda machine. Open it and you can tell that substantially it makes only two assertions on the Skripal case, and both are false:
    …”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-30/salisbury-incident-report-hard-evidence-soft-minds

  10. 2018 March 30 12:34 pm
    [10]
    bc3b permalink

    Welcome to Germany 2018, where police break up a machette fight between 80 Lebanonese, Turks and Kurds:

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/938824/Germany-news-duisburg-state-of-emergency-fight-riot-machetes

  11. 2018 March 30 12:57 pm
    [11]
    drdog09 permalink

    10,

    Probably a bad thing to say, especially Easter weekend. But so long as only 1 comes out alive where’s the problem?

    “Lord please forgive me and bless the pygmies….”

  12. 2018 March 30 2:58 pm
    [13]
    drdog09 permalink

    Eph,

    Here is hoping you have your love ones gathered about you for Seder.

    Peace my friend.

  13. 2018 March 30 3:15 pm
    [14]
    justrand permalink

    I just heard that Home Depot will not advertise on Laura Ingraham any more…I just became a Loews only shopper, and will cut up my Home Depot card. And I will TELL THEM ABOUT IT.

  14. 2018 March 30 3:59 pm
    [15]
    bc3b permalink

    JR –

    Put away those scissors. It’s Office Depot, not Home Depot:

    http://thehill.com/homenews/media/381026-office-depot-to-no-longer-advertise-with-laura-ingrahams-show

  15. 2018 March 30 4:19 pm
    [16]
    bc3b permalink

    My boycott list keeps getting longer: General Electric, Kellogg’s, General Mills, Office Depot, Espedia, Campbell’s Soup, Pizza Hut, the NFL, Budweiser, Target BP & Castrol, Pepsi, Coke, etc. Liberty Mutual just cancelled but I would never buy their insurance because their commercials with the minimum wage actors suck so much.

    Ever notice that, outside of Farmers, all insurance commercials suck – Liberty Mutual, USAA, Allstate, State Farm, Liberty Mutual? The worst are the Progressive commercials with Flo.

  16. 2018 March 30 4:58 pm
    [17]
    Eph permalink

    JR,

    No! Office Depot.

  17. 2018 March 30 4:59 pm
    [18]
    Eph permalink

    13 Dr,

    Thank you brother. We are getting started in about an hour or so.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.