Exterminating Whitey

2019 January 29
by bc3b
We see it so often – the demonization of white Christian males by the left and its communication arm – the media. Recent examples include the demonization of Brett Kavanaugh, the Gillette “toxic masculinity” commercial where the villains where white guys and men of color played the heroic roles and, of course the boys from Covington Catholic.
Nick Sandmann and his classmates were automatically guilty because they were white, male, Christian and conservative. Ethan Phillips, being a Native American, was automatically the victim and, therefore viewed as innocent. The fact that his story was shown to be completely fabricated (with video evidence) didn’t matter.

In case anyone still needs confirmation, the rage and frenzy surrounding the supposed standoff caught on video last week between Covington Catholic High School students and an anti-Catholic, Native American activist demonstrates as nothing else has lately that the political left’s primary aim, the end game of identity politics, is the demonization of white Christian men.

Covington student Nicholas Sandmann (pictured above) was the unfortunate epicenter of this tempest-in-a-teapot concocted entirely by the activist media, in which he and his classmates were falsely portrayed as racist bullies surrounding and taunting a frail Native American “elder,” Nathan Phillips. The truth – that it was the schoolboys who were verbally assaulted by Black Hebrew Israelite activists, and that Sandmann did and said nothing but stand his ground and smile in the face of Phillips’ provocation – swiftly came to light, but not before the entire country had squared off over the lie.

It wasn’t that the news media got the story wrong, which would imply that they made a mistake, but that they didn’t care about getting it right. They didn’t care, because they saw an opportunity to dehumanize a white male wearing that triggering symbol of white supremacy, the “Make America Great Again” cap, and decided to run with a narrative that could be weaponized against President Trump and his “angry white male” supporters. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it,” master strategist Saul Alinsky once taught, and Catholic white boy Sandmann became the left’s target of the moment.

Some media outlets gradually and quietly backed off from their original rush to judgment as more video and context emerged, but the damage was done, the political divide between Americans was widened, and the more fervent leftists clung to their bigoted view that Sandmann represents the toxic, Christian white male underbelly of an America that bears racism in its very DNA, as Barack Obama once declared.

The media hurricane was reminiscent of the crazed spectacle of last October’s confirmation hearings for Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a devout Catholic who was viewed as the poster boy for the left’s favorite bogeyman, “white privilege.” Based on a single, decades-old, evidence-free allegation, the Alinsky-trained left smeared Kavanaugh as a drunken sexual predator (and even pedophile) whose addition to the Court would hurl women into a misogynistic dystopia straight out of TheHandmaid’s Tale.

Sandmann is the left’s new Kavanaugh. On Twitter, BuzzFeed senior culture correspondent Anne Helen Petersen made that connection explicit by pairing Sandmann’s photo with one of Justice Kavanaugh’s smiling face and called their expressions “the look of white patriarchy.” Ebony Elizabeth Thomas, a University of Pennsylvania associate professor in education, tweeted that Sandmann represents “the smiling face of whiteness.” So “Smiling While White” is now essentially a hate crime. In fact, Smiling While White is not even considered a smile; it’s a “smirk,” and smirking is now seen as something only whites do. Has no one ever seen Barack Obama’s face?

Read More

Hat tip: frontpagemag,com


15 Responses leave one →
  1. 2019 January 29 5:15 am
    drdog09 permalink

    I think this explains the psychosis of the Salem Witch trials. The Puritans did not have cameras is all that is missing.

  2. 2019 January 29 5:58 am
    drdog09 permalink

  3. 2019 January 29 6:37 am
    drdog09 permalink

    Yes, Sammy, street legal back then. — http://www.mouseguns.com/blast/bigguns.gif

  4. 2019 January 29 7:08 am
    justrand permalink

    as I mentioned on the previous thread, my Dad’s advice to me was: “When someone says they want to do you harm, or even kill you, believe them!

    The Left isn’t even attempting to hide their plans anymore, they just assume we don’t believe they mean it. THEY MEAN IT.

  5. 2019 January 29 7:21 am
    justrand permalink

    all the agencies that Obama weaponized against us are still under the control of his minions…EVERY ONE. Jeff Sessions never even TRIED to drain the DOJ swamp, Christopher Wray said NOTHING about the Gestapo raid on Roger Stone by his FBI, and the CIA is out of control.

    I don’t think we can count on our government to side with us in the coming conflict


  6. 2019 January 29 7:27 am
    justrand permalink

    something to ponder:

    Roger Stone’s wife is DEAF. When the FBI swooped down on his house with 29 HEAVILY ARMED “agents”, 17 vehicles, 2 ARMORED vehicles and a helicopter, she was sound asleep in her nightgown.

    What if one (or more) of those HEAVILY ARMED “agents” had shot her…even killed her…because she couldn’t comply with their SHOUTED orders, since she couldn’t hear them???

    Think about it.

  7. 2019 January 29 9:49 am
    drdog09 permalink


    A follow-on of sorts — https://abc13.com/dirtbags-on-notice-after-police-officers-shot-in-houston/5110763/

    My suggestion to the Hou Union Rep — If you want more support to clean up the dirt bags, kick out the dirt bags in your own PD first. Hou PD is known to be dirty. — http://www.texaswatchdog.org/2011/05/sterling-state-records-for-houston-police-officers-fired/1306351185.story — Texas you have a problem. Fix it.

  8. 2019 January 29 10:16 am
    justrand permalink

    In ‘1984’, Winston, a worker at The Ministry of Truth, has begun to have doubts about Big Brother’s regime…and realizes how dangerous such doubts are. After an encounter with a young woman who also appears to have “doubts”, Winston wonders whether his FACIAL EXPRESSIONS have betrayed him:

    His earlier thought returned to him: probably she was not actually a member of the Thought Police, but then it was precisely the amateur spy who was the greatest danger of all. He did not know how long she had been looking at him, but perhaps for as much as five minutes, and it was possible that his features had not been perfectly under control. It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself — anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called.

    FACECRIME…the “crime” the young man from Covington Catholic High School was accused and convicted of by the Leftist/media cabal.

    Given the fact that the Left has decreed that THEY, and only they, are the arbiters of what is and isn’t “Inappropriate Thought, Action and Speech” (aka: “Hate Speech”), how long before they use facial-scanning technology to start prosecuting “FaceCrime”???

    Not long, folks…not long.

  9. 2019 January 29 10:20 am
    bc3b permalink

    JR #8 –

    No one ever criticized Obama for his smirk.

  10. 2019 January 29 10:42 am
    justrand permalink

    Bc3b…because Obama is a member of Ruling Elite…it’s only Proles who get prosecuted.

  11. 2019 January 29 11:32 am
    JimNorCal permalink

    9, good point!

  12. 2019 January 29 11:34 am
    mulletover permalink

    I do not criticize anyone for their appearance, even obama. Besides, it is difficult to discern his facial expression since he wears his ass upon his shoulders.

  13. 2019 January 29 11:58 am
    justrand permalink

    well spoken, mullet! 🙂

  14. 2019 January 29 1:21 pm

    “When someone says they want to do you harm, or even kill you, believe them!”

    Uniparty: Unless they are Muslim, then surround yourself with as many as possible.

    Also saw this..ouch.

  15. 2019 January 29 3:14 pm
    JimNorCal permalink

    Protesters at California Community College viciously mock a crying woman as she recites the Pledge of Allegiance, while holding a flag in the air and a picture of her father who was a veteran.

    This is how much liberals hate America. Despicable. pic.twitter.com/sGtjl2pmBY
    — Red Nation Rising (@RedNationRising) January 29, 2019

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.